![]() ![]() Is that difference worth a few hundred dollars? ![]() Both would be good, they agreed, but they would be different. Not necessarily, said the experts, who suspected the seafaring wine was evolving along a different molecular path. OK, I said, but if the traditionally stored wine had been stored a bit longer, would it eventually soften and mellow out like the silkier ocean-aged wine? And when the wines were identified, the ocean-aged wine had won out again. For the second round, using a 2016 Ocean Fathoms Super Tuscan that would sell for around $50 (or several times as much if it’s taken a dip), two more glasses were set before each of us, but we weren’t told which wine had spent a year living with the fishes.Īgain, the result was unanimous. I thought we were supposed to do a blind tasting. I raised a hand and asked why we had been told in advance which wine was which. She, Booras and Stolpman all said they’d be curious to see how their own wines fared underwater. Joseph, like the others, seemed impressed, intrigued and a bit surprised by the results. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |